Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Timothy Michael Paulson's avatar

I 100% hear this, and think that people often abuse or misuse scripture in ways that further hurts people that are hurting.

But I will use the logic that Christian evolutionists (like myself) use: the Bible is not a science textbook. The ancients did not know the biology of human development. But biology tells us that from conception, there is new life in a woman's reproductive system. So, does God cherish life?

We use the argument that God cherishes life when we talk about "creation care" and the environment, and rightly so. So why does that argument disappear when it comes to the new biological life in a woman, if she decides she does not want that life? Why does a "choice" decide what is biologically true? It is wishful thinking and not Biblically, ethically, or logically consistent.

That said, we should not use this to shame or condemn women. We should use it to support women and offer hope and support.

Expand full comment
M. Fearghail's avatar

Greetings. I happened to find your 5/3/2022 article today. The context was the court decision at the time. I have argued from both science and scripture, to prove that "abortion" (the murder of the unborn child), except to save the mother's life, is morally wrong. See my original Appalachian Irishman website article: WORLDVIEWS in CONFLICT: PRO-LIFE ARGUMENT WON EASILY (published 6-30-2022; article #337). Perhaps you will form a solid conviction on the topic, by a proper understanding of science and scripture. Jesus affirms the right to life of the innocent unborn, of course.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts